How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 70832
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
12826847
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

I have a case currently where my employer has alleged that

This answer was rated:

Hi i have a case currently where my employer has alleged that i have stolen Equipment and have reported this to the police, the police have visited and found no evidence however they are saying it appears i am selling stolen equipment on ebay which is not the case as eveything i have is with permission, how i would go about defending myself?
I think that the key is for you to be able to provide them with proof that the items you are selling have been purchased by you - so proof. Receipts or some other such proof. Happy to discuss but please rate positive.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
The IT equipment was given with verbal permission as an employee, it was not purchased?.
HiAre you selling anything ?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Not currently no, items are sold
Ok.
I presume they belonged to your employer?
Or not?
What were the circumstances of that sale?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Yes they belonged to the employer however i was given permission that it is ok to take the items
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
How would we go about defence?
Is there any evidence of that?
Obviously it is unusual.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
The evidence they have according the police is ebay but there are no company polices define anywhere
No, but on eBay the police have evidence you are selling their products? I'm surprised they are satin there is no case unless there is more to this
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
They have asked to interview us on wednesday, they came looking for all the items but found nothing at my house
You mean the police have asked you to be interviewed?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Yes correct
Ok.
You are still being investigated. They just haven't been able to find the goods which is to be expected as they say that you have sold them.
In terms of proving this, ultimately there are no magic wands. All you can do is gather the evidence that is available. If there is no written evidence then it comes down to their words against yours and the credibility of both positions.
I haven't had vision of these items or your set up but realistically you will have to really go some to convince anybody that your employer gave you permission to sell his goods for your personal gain. One wonders what he gets out of it. I suppose if you can establish that there was a good reason that would help.
Can I clarify anything for you?
Jo
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
How can i convince that the employer gave me permission? The only thing i can say is other staff members have IT equipment as well?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
So i feel i am being singled out?
Well, that is always impossible to answer. There are no guaranteed ways of achieving that.
The way you convince is to give evidence in a way that is believable and compelling. How that is done is impossible to say.
Generally speaking it is easier to do if you are telling the truth than not but otherwise it is impossible to say what makes an account believable.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Ok what do you think are my chances and how i should go about my defense
You will have to really go some to convince anybody that your employer gave you permission to sell his goods for your personal gain. One wonders what he gets out of it.
I'm not sure what you mean about your defence? Can you ask a specific question?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Do you defend a person if they are guilty? Or only if they are not guilty?
Oh yes, some defendants are guilty.
Mind you, quite a lot of complainants are just next week's defendant as well so there are no real innocent parties in most criminal cases. Victims become victims because of the company that they keep.
The only time that lawyers have to withdraw is if they are asked to advance something that they know is a lie.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
How much truth does one tell your solictor about the case circumstances
You should be full and frank with a solicitor. Otherwise they can't advise you properly.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
How often does the cps drop cases where the defendants state they were. Authorised to take the alleged theft equipment or belived it was ok to take the equipment
It is very unlikely that CPS will not charge this I'm afraid.
What you are dealing with is the chances of getting off at court.
To be wholly honest, you might struggle to argue that your employers gave you permission to sell their equipment for your personal gain.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
If equipment was given to employees to take home and do as they wish does it matter if they than decide to sell it to make some cash
Yes.
Being given equipment to use is not permission to sell.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
But surely equipment given which the company is disposing off is now yours and you would be entitled to sell it as there were no specifics defined at fhe time the equipment was given
Not unless they said that specifically.
Trouble is that it begs the question of why they didn't just sell it themselves. I'm really sorry but it just isn't particularly credible that they would allow sale for employees personal gain.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 70832
Experience: Over 5 years in practice
Jo C. and other Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
What sort of sentence does one expect for proven theft/dishonesty
Whats the value roughly?
I'm happy to continue with this but please rate my answer.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Upto value of £7000.00
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
how is theft treated if alleged equipment is identified for sale on ebay by employers but the equipment was not taken yet but was intended to be taken if sold on ebay
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Value of equpment = £7000.00 approx
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Hi Jo, what do you think?
I would concentrate on being acquitted.
Im afraid the sentences are fairly high for theft from employer and this is a high amount. It probably does get over the custodial threshold although a court would probably suspend it if you have no previous convictions.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
What is the custodial threshhold and what does suspended sentence mesn
Prison I'm afraid
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
How does one getacquitted?
You give evidence in a way that is believed.
Presuming you have a defence of course.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Well my defence is that A) i were given permission by our manager b) there is no specific guidelines or company rules c) other people in the company take things and have company property in their homes... So i feel i have been somewhat singled out?
Points b and c are non issues.
Unless you had specific permission from somebody able to give permission there is no defence.
Then you have to explain why this firm didn't mind you selling £7k of equipment for person gain.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Well i had permission from my manager however now he has changed his tune in that he is denying employees can take equipment!
Yes, I thought that might have happened. People do sometimes lie I'm afraid.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Hi jo
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
In my contract it states the following please see attached
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
I had permission therefore i do not understand why they are saying everything inhave been given over the last 6 years is stolen.?
Probably because they are saying dont believe you had permission.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
So what would i do to defend myself in this case?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
What do you think the chances are in court of one persons word against another being in favour of the alleged person? In other words who would the jury believe to be telling the thruth?
There is no way of predicting that really. It depends on too many variables.
Given the value of these items it might be difficult to get a jury to accept that things were as you say.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
My company has asked me to attend an investigatory meeting now without a lawyer when there is a Criminal case pending? They are advising me that i cannot have anyone acompany me, do you think this is advisable or correct?
That is an employment question and I wouldn't know the answer to that. From a criminal point of view, I don't particularly like it as it is just an opportunity to say something contrary to interest.
If you are on a subscription then posting another question should not cost extra. My colleague Ben is an employment specialist.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
We have asked Ben, and he is stating that this is two seperate issues and that there should be no issue attending the interview, i am finding this very difficult because on one hand i have the criminal investigation and the other is that the employer is asking me to attend a meeting?
I wouldn't know anything about the employment situation I'm afraid.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
What would you say from
Your opnion that my chances are if this did go to court?
I haven't had vision of these items or your set up but realistically you will have to really go some to convince anybody that your employer gave you permission to sell his goods for your personal gain. One wonders what he gets out of it. I suppose if you can establish that there was a good reason that would help.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Ok but how would you prove your defence?
Well, that is always impossible to answer. There are no guaranteed ways of achieving that.
The way you convince is to give evidence in a way that is believable and compelling. How that is done is impossible to say.
Generally speaking it is easier to do if you are telling the truth than not but otherwise it is impossible to say what makes an account believably