How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 70416
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
12826847
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

I was on trial last 2.5 weeks to

Resolved Question:

Hi, I was on trial for the last 2.5 weeks for conspricacy to commit fraud. The jury went out on Tuesday at 12pm. By 3pm Wednesday the jury still couldn't come to a unanimous verdict. At this the time the judge said she would accept a majority verdict, but gave no mention to the jury about any further options I.e. A hung jury leading to no verdict. I suppose my question is should she have? I believe if the jury had have been told about this option they would have come back with the decision that they were split, but because they were never told about this option they came back with a majority verdict of 10-2 guilty.
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Hi.
Thank you for your question. My name is ***** ***** I will try to help with this.
No. Absolutely not. A jury should never be told that they can be hung. Otherwise they will just give up and stop trying.
Generally speaking, a wise defence counsel will keep them seeking a unanimous verdict for as long as possible to avoid making a conviction easier.
Sorry if that is bad news but a jury should never be told they don't have to agree.
Can I clarify anything for you?
Jo
Jo C. and other Law Specialists are ready to help you