How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 70209
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
12826847
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

Dog (not a dangerous breed - terrier) kills a cat 4 years ago

Resolved Question:

Dog (not a dangerous breed - terrier) kills a cat 4 years ago after escaping its garden and entering unsecured neighbours garden. This action is unreported but cat owners provide witness statements. The same dog allegedly injures a cat this year whilst being exercised off a lead in public open countryside. The cat was chased into an unsecured garden (or was already in its owners garden). No strict proof available but owners provide witness statements alleging two dogs attacked their cat.
Is the person exercising the dogs (also the owner) liable for the vet bill arising and if so is there a limit and can a defence of volenti (cat owner should have secured their garden) be won? Bill is several thousand pounds. Claimant suggests that he had no knowledge of the risk and likens the risk to walking along a road not expecting to be run over.
Claimant will not negotiate. Without prejudice offer of half bill rejected. Offer disclosed in particulars of claim.
Submitted: 1 year ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Volenti has no relevance here.The Animals Act 1971 imposes liability upon owners for the conduct of dogs in two circumstances - where there is negligence or where there is a previous incident sufficient to create knowledge of a predilection in the dog.
Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
The first incident would probably not be sufficient but the second would potentially.The person in charge of the dog could be liable if there was negligence on that occasion.The owner, if different, could try to exclude liability bye arguing that the dog should have been under the control of the walker.
Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
There is no limit upon liability unless, of course the cost was not incurred.Can I clarify anything for you?Jo
Jo C. and other Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
I know the 1971 act and the prior knowledge that the dog chases cats and can harm them. Is walking the dog off a lead in open countryside negligent therefore? Is it worth going to court or just paying the claim.
Expert:  Jo C. replied 1 year ago.
Not per se. Dogs need to be off lead sometimes.If there had been a previous incident involving that dog then walking off lead could be negligent.