How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Clare Your Own Question

Clare
Clare, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 33821
Experience:  I have been a solicitor in High Street Practice since 1985 with a wide general experience.
13262538
Type Your Law Question Here...
Clare is online now

Whoever... My (ex)Bankruptcy trustees are pursuing the

Customer Question

Hi, whoever...
My (ex)Bankruptcy trustees are pursuing the family home. There is a hearing set in June for possession, sale etc
At the same time, I have been contesting (since January) a form J restriction application at the Land Registry on the basis that I own 0% as a tenant in common. The LR doesn't disagree so has not granted the application, and is taking it to a First Tier Tribunal in July (date not yet set) for resolution.
Can I, and how, get the first case stayed or whatever on the basis that the 0% issue is older and should anyway be resolved first, because it has such an impact on the possession case? I have seen the argument in an HMRC case but it was not resolved on that basis.
Is such parallel litigation acceptable?
If not, can I enforce abandonment of the form J restriction application?
Thank you *****
Submitted: 10 months ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Clare replied 10 months ago.

Thank you for your question

My name is Clare

I shall do my best to help you but I need some further information first

How did the percentage division come to be 100/0

Customer: replied 10 months ago.
Morning Clare, I'm David.In this house, from 1992 to 2003 we were joint tenants.
In 2003 we officially became tenants in common, with Land Registry Form A restriction added to the property register.
We executed and have retained a properly drawn up and witnessed deed showing the 100/0 split. A mortgage would not allow me to simply dispose of my 'share'. No solicitor was involved.There is considerable evidence that I have never paid any mortgage etc - it has been paid by my wife or by a company that she alone controls (records going back 7 years and probably to 2001 with some effort).
Enough evidence anyway to convince the LR not to accept a form J restriction without going to tribunal.The other side want 100% proof of her privately paying (+ deposit etc) all the way back to 1992. They complain that the 2003 deed is not publicly registered - a 'deed in the drawer', but we argue that that is/was not necessary because the fact that a deed existed is/was known from the LR entry. Registration is not mandatory.??
Expert:  Clare replied 10 months ago.

Why did you do it at that time?

Customer: replied 10 months ago.
There was no pressure (eg no creditors) - we had just discovered it was possible to do it and therefore to regularise the longstanding (beneficial) ownership situation, and that the Northern Rock wouldn't/couldn't object.
Expert:  Clare replied 10 months ago.

How long have you been married?

Customer: replied 10 months ago.
40 years
Expert:  Clare replied 10 months ago.

When did you go bankrupt?

Customer: replied 10 months ago.
May 5th 2015. Now ex-bankrupt - they thought I was co-operative until May 5th 2016. Not any more.D
Expert:  Clare replied 10 months ago.

Why would you wish to force the Form J applictaion to be abandoned?

Customer: replied 10 months ago.
The form J ensures that the bankruptcy trustees can take 50% of net house proceeds (my assumed share) when sold in order to pay all 'debts' and costs, which I don't want to happen.
If it is cancelled it may be possible to sell free of restriction and keep 100% of proceeds.
Expert:  Clare replied 10 months ago.

I am afraid that there is no chance of the Form J application being abandoned.

It is not unusual for parallel litigation to be in place and in effect the issues being decided are the same.

It is unlikely that you can successfully apply for the Possession proceedings to be stayed BUT you can ask for it to be adjourned pending the outcome of the Tribunal and you have an excellent argument for doing so since as you rightly point out this is the crux of the issue.

Please ask if you need further details

Clare, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 33821
Experience: I have been a solicitor in High Street Practice since 1985 with a wide general experience.
Clare and 2 other Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 10 months ago.
That's helpful, thank youOver & outDC
Expert:  Clare replied 10 months ago.

You are most welcome - I hope all goes well

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Jo C.

    Jo C.

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    30316
    Over 5 years in practice
< Previous | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/EM/emus/2015-7-7_192327_bigstockportraitofconfidentfemale.64x64.jpg Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    30316
    Over 5 years in practice
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BE/benjones/2015-12-1_0437_ennew.64x64.jpg Ben Jones's Avatar

    Ben Jones

    UK Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    11553
    Qualified Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BU/Buachaill/2012-5-25_211156_barrister5.64x64.jpg Buachaill's Avatar

    Buachaill

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    1754
    Barrister 17 years experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/JO/jojobi/2013-3-19_0265_maxlowryphoto.64x64.jpg Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry

    Advocate

    Satisfied Customers:

    894
    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/UK/UKLawyer/2012-4-12_9849_F2.64x64.jpg UK_Lawyer's Avatar

    UK_Lawyer

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    750
    I am a qualified solicitor and an expert in UK law.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/KA/Kasare/kasare.64x64.jpg Kasare's Avatar

    Kasare

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    402
    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/OS/osh/2015-7-7_19268_gettyimagesb.64x64.jpg Joshua's Avatar

    Joshua

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8199
    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice