Hello thank you for the document I will check it and get back to you in due course.
Hi there, I do agree that nothing in the letter states that the eligibility for the bonus is dependent on the successful completion of the project or the sale going through. However, this could all be down to interpretation and the intentions of the employer when they were offering this bonus. For example, would it be usually expected of them to give a bonus if no successful completion of such projects was achieved? Is it clear that they had always intended this to be a bonus payable only on successful completion, despite this not being mentioned as a specific term? Would a reasonable person have understood this to be a successful completion and this only being a misunderstanding or a play on words? So there are many factors which would come into consideration when your position is examined. Sadly there is no definitive answer, nothing in black and white would guarantee a successful outcome for you. Even having the letter which does not state anything about successful completion is not in itself a guarantee that you will be eligible for the bonus as a court can decide that these were never the employer’s intentions.
In effect, only a court can decide what you would be entitled to and if you should have any eligibility to this bonus. You are not in a weak position necessarily, it is certainly possible that you may come out victorious from this but you would have to go to court and as you can imagine that may sour the relationship between you and the employer. So thin carefully before you proceed. You also have the internal grievance procedure first before you consider legal action and I suggest you use that.
This is your basic legal position. I have more detailed advice for you in terms of the steps you need to follow should you decide to take this further formally, which I wish to discuss so please take a second to leave a positive rating for the service so far (by selecting 3, 4 or 5 stars) and I can continue with that and answer any further questions you may have. Don’t worry, there is no extra cost and leaving a rating will not close the question and we can continue this discussion. Thank you
Hello, I see you have read my response to your query. Please let me know if this has answered your original question and if you need me to discuss the next steps in more detail? In the meantime please take a second to leave a positive rating by selecting 3, 4 or 5 starts from the top of the page. The question will not close and I can continue with my advice as discussed. Thank you
Hello, do you need any further assistance or are you happy with the above response? Look forward to hearing from you.
Hi there, in black and white it may indeed be arguable that all the payment of the bonus requires is completion of the project, whether successful or not. But law is not always that simple – there are express terms, such as those written and identifiable, and there are implied terms, those that are not specifically recorded but which can be implemented based on the specific circumstances or the parties’ intentions. It is not just as easy as one party saying ‘this is what I intended so this is what the terms will be’ – it takes a lot more than that for something to be implemented, especially if it potentially goes against the express terms. But I was just advising you of the potential situation and what you need to be aware of in these circumstances, there is every chance that a court can decide in your favour. So my initial response was not a case of telling you that is what will happen, but just advising you of the, hopefully remote, possibility that it may be challenged in that way. I would agree with your position and that your argument is stronger but i am not a judge and not the one who makes the final decision, should this be challenged.
If you wanted to take it further due to the employer not willing to honour the bonus clause, then whenever a dispute arises over money owed by one party to another, the debtor can be pursued through the civil courts for recovery of the debt. As legal action should always be seen as a last resort, there are certain actions that should be taken initially to try and resolve this matter informally and without having to involve the courts. It is recommended that the process follows these steps:
1. Reminder letter – if no reminders have been sent yet, one should be sent first to allow the debtor to voluntarily pay what is due.
2. Letter before action – if informal reminders have been sent but these have been ignored, the debtor must be sent a formal letter asking them to repay the debt, or at least make arrangements for its repayment, within a specified period of time. A reasonable period to demand a response by would be 10 days. They should be advised that if they fail to do contact you in order to resolve this matter, formal legal proceedings will be commenced to recover the debt. This letter serves as a ‘final warning’ and gives the other side the opportunity to resolve this matter without the need for legal action.
3. Before you consider starting legal action you may wish to consider sending a formal statutory demand. This is a legal request which asks the debtor to pay the outstanding debt within 21 days and failure to do so will allow you to bankrupt the debtor (if they are an individual ) or wind up the company (if they are a business). For the relevant forms to serve a statutory demand see here: https://www.gov.uk/statutory-demands/forms-to-issue-a-statutory-demand
4. If they fail to pay or at least make contact to try and resolve this, formal legal proceedings can be initiated. A claim can be commenced online by going to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk. Once the claim form is completed it will be sent to the debtor and they will have a limited time to defend it. If they are aware legal proceedings have commenced it could also prompt them to reconsider their position and perhaps force them to contact you to try and resolve this.
Whatever correspondence is sent, it is always advisable to keep copies and use recorded delivery so that there is proof of delivery and a paper trail. The court may need to refer to these if it gets that far.