The wording the court used is “factual possession” so it is the fact of the possession, not the knowledge of the possession which is relevant
This is becoming more of a debate and an analysis of the various areas of law which is exactly the kind of argument that would be decided by the court. LR 2002 supersedes PvG.
I’m going to opt out for another expert. Best wishes
I have read the exchange above and can confirm the answers you have received are correct.