You have a potential claim if you only agreed to the injection because the side-effects were short-term and you are now exhibiting long-term effects and you wouldn’t have undertaken the jab had you known of the long-term side effects.
However, the long-term side effects have to be reasonably foreseeable and if there are only, for example, one in 10,000 people who have long-term side-effects, then it’s not reasonably foreseeable and there is no negligence claim.
I am not a medical expert so I can’t comment on the link between the side-effects, the injection and the schizophrenia.
Regardless, what you are going to need is a medical expert to prove the link is going to be problematical. It is accepted that you didn’t have the symptoms before but without a medical expert saying that the symptoms came from that jab, then your claim will not succeed.
It would be worthwhile speaking to a few solicitors who deal with clinical negligence matters on a no win no fee basis but I think you will struggle to get what to take it on.
Can I clarify anything for you?
Please don’t forget to rate the service positive. It is an important part of the process by which experts get paid.