I am sorry for the delay - I have been checking all the details - it is fascinating reading and I wished to be certain that I had a good grip on it
I can understand how the approach that this gentleman has taken in presenting the appalling way that he was treated looks as if it has wider implications.
However as ever the devil is in the details
In fact the reason why his mortgage deed was not valid (although an equitable mortgage IS confirmed) is nothing to do with when the witness signed or when the date was added - all of which were in fact said NOT to be relevant - it was about the fact the TRustees were treated as a corporation and not as individuals as they should have been
This does not have any relevance to your position
I am afraid that the rest has no legal validity - this is not a gift that creates mythical money - that is the same as saying that paper money is not valid as it is a "promise to pay the bearer" which of course is now simply pretty wording and not legally enforceable.
By all means fight the Receivers - but if you do it based on this case law you will fail because yours is NOT a family trust.
I am sorry - and I have looked into all the details in the hope it could work - but much of the arguments he puts forward on these sites are NOT the ones that won the case in court