1 No. It is a civil case.
2 Yes, this isn't an urgent matter.
3 Not on these facts. If you removed a bollard then that is criminal damage. It is theft i suppose if you didn't return it but that is not really what they allege here.
The signing is a non issue.
There is no delay here. This is not a delay case. There has been no delay.
You have left a negative rating.
I will be delighted to continue with this if that was a mistake.
You will need to email customer services about that as Im never involved in billing. you can get them on***@******.***
I have seen your subsequent question but you have left a negative rating.
Let me know if I can help.
Ok. Can I help any further?
1 Yes, lawful excuse is a defence written into the statute. Protecting property would be lawful excuse although obviously it turns on facts.
2 Because that is a self remedy in civil law and is exempt because you would have lawful excuse.
3 Not sure what you mean?
4 Well, they will probably try to argue that you were not protecting property. Or that you went over the top. The latter is easier to raise.
5 They may well do that.