I have looked at the document now.
Clause 3.1 There is an initial period of 12 months starting from 17 March 2014.
Under clause 3.2 the agreement rolls over subject to 3 months notice, subject to clause 19.
Clause 19 then refers to clauses 15, 17, 20, 21, 23, 25, 28, 32, 33, 34, which continue.
15 you’re not allowed to use intellectual property, quite normal
17 you’re not allowed to use any of the confidential information, quite normal
20 I will come back to.
21 you will pay their costs for non-compliance with the agreement, quite normal
23 data protection, nothing to worry about
25 third-party rights, nothing to worry about
28 interest, normal
32, 33 34 normal but I don’t know why they referred to them in the body of the document. They are standard provisions.
I said I would come back to clause 20. This in effect stops you carrying on the same business or working for a competing business for six months after termination. Courts don’t like restrictive covenants in employment contracts or franchise agreements and it’s debatable whether a six-month clause within the Territory which is defined as the area allocated to the franchisee by the franchisor but is not actually defined and which therefore it should be. However it does say at clause 22 that this is the entire agreement and hence, if there is no Territory allocated in the agreement, then they cannot rely on clause 20 to stop you working in the Territory when there is no definition of territory in this agreement.
Can I clarify anything for you? Please rate the service positive so that I get paid. We can still exchange emails. Best wishes. FES.