Hi - would you like to explain the situation in more detail please
I am sorry but it is bad news
He has a conviction for downloading images. He is plainly a danger. I realise that he himself might not have abused any children but this is plainly a conviction that would give rise to concern.
It might well have been that they should have acted earlier to be consistent but that is an issue of resources.
They are plainly entitled to act Im afraid.
Can I clarify anything for you?
Not if this is just a child protection conference.
A court order would be different.
I'm not sure it is right now.
if they actually act against you then it would be but all that is happening now is that it is being discussed.
There are many cases where they do no more than investigate.