i spoke to u before .
can a ct clearly identify a Liver met?
Ok. If it was a met would the rafiologist have stated in the report metsases disease ? Or do they word it different?
also surely the mdt team would have an idea wat this is right ? In don't get y his onco just said we are not sure . What kind of an answer is that
said cancer appearance or mets . He has mentioned a large lymph node 10 mm and this lesion .
In the impression section , he put:
appearances keeping with disease progression .
Yes. Does what he has put " disease progression " mean metsases ?
Is there treatment for liver met?
What is prignosis like ?
Is it better with 1
met? Also surgery can lead to cure right?
Could it be that the onco held back thsts y said we don't know what the lesion is yet?
could it be that he wAnted to hold bk till the pet ?
But can this not be known from a ct with contrast?
also would liver me not have high cea?
My my dad's is 8 at present .
Ok. Sorry I'm really worried as you can probably tell.
The words his onco used were the lesion looks cloudy ?
do mets look cloudy ?
He said lesion cloudy so we can't tell
Last question , is there a difference between if the radiologist writes disease progression in a ct report and metsases disease ?