Hello, welcome to the website. My name isXXXXX can assist you with this.
No, I don't see anything wrong with what you're proposing here at all.
The purchaser doesn't have anything as far as I can see.
Of course it depends what your contract terms are, and the purchaser would need to take advice on those, but I see nothing inherently objectionable to this.
Thank you. I am a retired FRICS, and feel the same. However, do you think that there is a legal cut off at the signing of the contract for sale/completion with that tenancy agreement scheduled, so that there can be no claim to possession(so-called squatters rights) except that granted for the duration of the tenancy de novo?
If it all happens together, I don't see the issue. At the end of the day, the owner cannot grant a tenancy to himself, it makes no legal sense. So the tenancy can only really be effective once ownership transfers anyway.
Brilliant! Thank you for that.
You're welcome. Do you want to me answer anything else for you about this?