We issued tenants with a STA in 2004 have not renewed regularly. We have a very good relationship with tenants. But they just cannot afford the rent now. The council will only re house them if we evict them, not if they leave voluntarily. The gov website says we must have protected their deposit if we want to evict them. Is this right even if they are so behind with rent? They now owe £2350 and the deposit was £1120.
Thanks that's v helpful. Can I clarify -
I renewed STA once in 2008 and I still hold deposit that was made in 2004. there was no mention of the deposit on the renewal. Does that mean it has lapsed now - what is the consequence of that?
I have issued a demand for rent today and are proposing to issue a section 8 notice in 7 days citing non payment of rent and unreliable rent payments.(the tenants want me to do this to help them get a council house)
In summary, we will not have any paperwork relating to deposit protection when we take all this to the court to apply for an accelerated eviction notice, can we state deposit taken pre 2007, is that sufficient?
Thanks for your response and clearly the s.8 is the way to go.
Could you elaborate on my 2nd paragraph... I will issue a s.8 notice on the grounds 8, 10 & 11. I will attach a copy of the rent book to show that the rent is in excess of 2 months late and that none of the rent due dates have been meet in the last 12 months.
I am a bit unsure as to what date to put in the s.8 notice. it asks "the court proceedings will not begin until after ??????".
I have already issued a rent demand to the tenant giving 7 days notice (14/7/14) for them to pay - I have spoken to the tenant and he does not have the money so will not be paying before that time.
Can I issue the s.8 notice now and then if nothing changes in the next two weeks apply to the court for a possession order?