I can wait another couple of days. Please let me know if you have been unable to find anyone by the end of business on Friday. Thanks!
1) My neighbour bought his leasehold property in the mid-1980s and I bought mine in 2004. A month or so after I moved in, we jointly purchased the freehold.
2) Yes. I will try to describe the geography. Our property is an end of terrace house at the end of the road. For all the houses in the road, the back gardens extend to a private right of way. The gardens of the houses in the next parallel road share the private right of way. Both ends of the right of way are gated where they give onto the roads at right angles. Our house is an end-terrace at the end of the road. A portion of land carved out at the bottom of our garden has been used for many years as a builder's yard. It gives onto the road at right angles to ours and has a postcode different from ours. This is the small plot which has a separate freehold title and belongs to the person who is claiming our land. It is approximately. The land at issue is the piece of the garden which does still extend to the same boundary on the right of way as everyone else's in the road. It is approximately 3 metres x 6 metres.
There is a fence between the leasehold property and the garden next door; a fence (renewed by the person claiming the land in the summer of 2013 - we now realise as a pre-emptive move) on the boundary with the right of way and on the third side it is defined by the back of the double garage which stands at the rear boundary of the builder's yard.
3) The garage was there when my co-freeholder bought his flat. The two fences have recently been renewed but, with the exception of the moving (by the claimant) of the gate into the right of way from its original central position to one adjoining the fence with the next door garden, remain in their original positions.
4) The reason for the claim is to facilitate the building of a house on the plot which is not large enough without (or even with!) the 2+ metres of our garden.
The justification is the Land Registry title plan which appears to show the land belonging to the garden as narrower than it is which the claimant 'proves' that our land only amounts to the width of a path alongside the fence with next door. (Hence the moving of the gate!) We have copied to the claimant an explanation from the Land Registry that the plans are only a guide. It has made no difference.
I hope this makes sense to you.
I hope I have succeeded in attaching three files. One is the leasehold deed created in 1975 showing the disputed section of our gardens highlighted with the yellow tag. The second is a plan submitted by the owner of the garage plot adjoining our land to the Land Registry when he re-registered his plot last year. The Land Registry has confirmed to us that they have adjusted only his eastern boundary to which I and my co-freeholder do not object. However, he is claiming that the Land Registry Plan
Thank you for your email. I hope this extra information will make it possible to add to your previous answer.
I will certainly leave positive feedback.
Yes, it is the owner of AGL48142 who is claiming this land. According to him, his title extends south some 2+ metres across the 8ft 11 leaving only the width of a path giving access from our garden to the private right of way. He is not so much wishing to move his southern boundary as claiming the land is already his and is including it, for the second time, in a planning application to build on his plot. The leasehold plan is pretty accurate. There may be a few centimetres to be negotiated with a reasonable neighbour, but no more.
Sorry for the delay, I have been away from my computer. I am happy to hear that you believe that the Land Registry's failure to specify his southern boundary indicates that my neighbour's claim is lacking in merit. On the other hand, the Land Registry seems to deny that it is the business of establishing boundaries and my ongoing concern is that he is behaving as if his claim is already proved and he continues to claim ownership of and to access the land. Is my only recourse to take him to law?