How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Remus2004 Your Own Question
Remus2004
Remus2004, Barrister
Category: Property Law
Satisfied Customers: 2451
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice.
12826847
Type Your Property Law Question Here...
Remus2004 is online now

I've been charged by LFRS under fire safety law

Customer Question

I've been charged by LFRS under fire safety law for breach of regulation.
I done mistake , plead guilty for 2 out of 6 charges:
-Few days late in completion of Enforecment Notice for maintenance.
-Not been able to prove maintenance of emergency lights.
Been find 10,5K plus costs.
During the investigation I been forced by the order of LFRS and council officers to open cover of fire alarm panel.
Reputeable safety expert from my side wrote in his report that it was very dangerous.
We complained to HSE and LFRS about it.
HSE asnswered that they dont find problem and LFRS didnt answer.
We appealed to HSE claiming that investigation without asking the expett and myself cant be good enough -but refused again proper investigation.
Can you assist?
Eli Zohar
Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Property Law
Expert:  Nicola-mod replied 2 years ago.
Hello,
I've been working hard to find a Professional to assist you with your question, but sometimes finding the right Professional can take a little longer than expected.
I wonder whether you're ok with continuing to wait for an answer. If you are, please let me know and I will continue my search. If not, feel free to let me know and I will cancel this question for you.
Thank you!
Nicola
Expert:  Ash replied 2 years ago.
Hello Eli my name is ***** ***** I will help you.
I do not quite understand - Expert said LFRS system was dangerous, but the HSE did not?
Is that right?