How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask propertylawyer Your Own Question

propertylawyer
propertylawyer, Solicitor
Category: Property Law
Satisfied Customers: 233
Experience:  Property solicitor with expertise in commercial and residential property transactions.
94563951
Type Your Property Law Question Here...
propertylawyer is online now

I engaged a solicitor to extend the lease on my flat using a

Customer Question

I engaged a solicitor to extend the lease on my flat using a section 42 notice because the freeholders were being unreasonable. That was stated to have been served at a valuation of The solicitor was using moved to a different firm during the response period. When the deadline arrived there was no response from the freeholders. I contacted the original firm but got no response I therefore felt it would be better to stay with the solicitor at his new firm because he knew our case. He then advised us that we should begin the procedure anew . We were unhappy because of the delay, but had no choice. Because of the timescale, our valuation had to be renewed, which cost £540 . Also because a year had passed the extension cost went up by about £900, and the premium demanded went up by £2025.
When the issue was finally settled it cost us £13250 premium plus costs.
After completion I raised a complaint with the original firm, and the ombudsman has ruled that the first section 42 was delivered correctly, and the tribunal would have agreed.
That means that the amount I am out of pocket is the difference between our first submitted valuation and the final settlement plus the second valuation cost, namely £13250 +£540 -£7850 = £5940.
Is it reasonable to pursue a claim for compensation against the second firm on that basis.
Submitted: 2 months ago.
Category: Property Law
Expert:  propertylawyer replied 2 months ago.

But isn't the issue here the fact that your matter was not handled correctly after service of a valid notice, I.e no follow up and the notice expiring, thus resulting in a new application and service of a new s.42 notice at greater cost.

This is not an issue about service of the initial notice but failings thereafter. Was there no mention of that in your complaint and the ombudsman's report?

Expert:  propertylawyer replied 2 months ago.

Do you have any further questions or queries? I am happy to assist further.

Customer: replied 2 months ago.
The Ombudsman merely ruled that their was no case to answer regarding the delivery or not of the first section 42 notice.
I did not mention the lack of follow up because that took place once he had moved to a different firm.
He advised us to resubmit after investigating the situation and we had no choice but to follow that advice.
The Ombudsman has clarified things because she has said there was sufficient evidence of posting and the tribunal would have accepted that as a fact.
I fully expected that the Tribunal would need proof of delivery and based my complaint on that. Obviously I was wrong.
So in answer to your question, no.
The Ombudsman noted that the first firms followup was poor and said they were lucky we moved onto the second firm midway, but didn't deem that to be grounds for compensation.

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Remus2004

    Remus2004

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    2427
    Over 5 years in practice.
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/EM/emus/2015-7-7_192327_bigstockportraitofconfidentfemale.64x64.jpg Remus2004's Avatar

    Remus2004

    Barrister

    Satisfied Customers:

    2427
    Over 5 years in practice.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/TG/TGraham12/2012-7-17_81212_bigstockBusinessHandshake508163.64x64.jpg Thomas's Avatar

    Thomas

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    414
    UK solicitor holding an England and Wales practising Certificate.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/KA/Kasare/kasare.64x64.jpg Kasare's Avatar

    Kasare

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    42
    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/OS/osh/2015-7-7_19268_gettyimagesb.64x64.jpg Joshua's Avatar

    Joshua

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    4708
    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/AS/Aston Lawyer/2013-10-8_19517_JAPROFILEPICTURE.64x64.jpg Aston Lawyer's Avatar

    Aston Lawyer

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    1823
    LLB(HONS) 20 years of experience in dealing with Conveyancing and Property Law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/CH/chathamchamber/2011-4-24_191833_1.64x64.jpg chatham-chamber's Avatar

    chatham-chamber

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    828
    LL.B, Pg.Dip, LL.M, M.B.A (Pending), Solicitor-Advocate. UK Practising Certificate issued by SRA., DIFC Courts Registered (Dubai)
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/CL/clairep80/2013-8-25_191218_dreamstimexs267279822nd.64x64.jpg Clare's Avatar

    Clare

    Solicitor

    Satisfied Customers:

    241
    I have been a solicitor in High Street Practise since 1985 with a wide general experience.