How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jo C. Your Own Question

Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Traffic Law
Satisfied Customers: 70109
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice.
Type Your Traffic Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

Ive received a court summons for a speeding offence on the

Customer Question

I've received a court summons for a speeding offence on the motorway. The location is incorrect on the "Traffic offence report" sheet he gave me at the time (photocopied and edited different to my copy), it states the wrong town and the motorway junctions match his written location.... 3 junctions north of where we were. The Charges letter states 2 different junctions, again, north of where we were (matching his corrections). I only have about 2 days to submit my plea. I was going to plead guilty but am annoyed that they're trying to prosecute me when they haven't got their facts correct. Do I notify them? I would like some advice please. I would rather not write specifics on an open area such as this though. Thanks for your help.


I have all the paperwork with me and can send copies if needs be. I don't think my description was very clear.

Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Traffic Law
Expert:  Jo C. replied 3 years ago.
Thank you for your question. My name is Jo and I will try to help with this.

The short answer is that it depends on your appetite for risk.

If you notify they will just amend the particulars. That will lead to the correct particulars which is all very well but its not your responsibility to help the crown out their house in order.

The other alternative is to plead not guilty as indeed you were not committing this offence at this location. There has been a recent case on this really just asserting the common sense position that you cannot be found guilty if the particulars are wrong.

Of course, they may during the course of the trial amend the particulars too and then you would have to plead. In principle you should not get whacked for costs in those circumstances but you can never really rely on that at the magistrates. The new procedure rules do say that the defence is supposed to notify the crown of the issues in the case although I have to say that I can never really understand what they think the consequence of not doing so is. If you just plain refuse to comment and put the crown to proof then nobody can stop you doing that.

Can I clarify anything for you?

Customer: replied 3 years ago.

What would the consequences be if I said not guilty by post and stated "I was not at that location at that time and date" or similar?


If I'm to be prosecuted for it then I want it to be correct, I work in engineering and despise inaccuracies such as this. So I'd rather the whole thing went away or I get charged with what I did at a particular time & place (correctly). There's Provida footage of my vehicle, but it will also show things like lampost numbers- so you'd know it wasn't where the officer wrote that it was.


What would you do? Would you contest it or just let it go?


Is all this conversation publicly viewable too?



Expert:  Jo C. replied 3 years ago.
Sorry for the delay overnight

If you attend court then you can offer a basis of plea to the prosecutor that the location is wrong.

In terms of what I would do, if can see the point you are making. There might not be much practical benefit in arguing it but the principle is that of the crown are going to bring prosecutions then they should be upon correct facts.

Yes, it is visible on the Internet but you are anonymous. I can ask customer services to remove it at the end but if I do that now it will close the question

What Customers are Saying:

  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther

Meet The Experts:

  • Jo C.

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice.
< Previous | Next >
  • Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice.
  • Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry


    Satisfied Customers:

    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • Kasare's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law.
  • Joshua's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice
  • Alice H's Avatar

    Alice H


    Satisfied Customers:

    Partner in national law firm
  • Jamie-Law's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

  • /img/opt/shirt.png LondonlawyerJ's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I am a solicitor with particular expertise in road traffic law.