How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Vincent2013 Your Own Question

Vincent2013, JustAnswer Expert
Category: Traffic Law
Satisfied Customers: 213
Experience:  Qualified solicitor and barrister (non-practising) with 7+ years experience
Type Your Traffic Law Question Here...
Vincent2013 is online now

Just received letter from Debt Recovery Plus on behalf of Smart

Customer Question

Just received letter from Debt Recovery Plus on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd, stating I have not paid parking charge of £120 I incurred at Asda Store on 29/11/13 for parking on double yellow lines. As. Disabled driver I thought this was permissible. Apparently not, on private land. Asked for photographic evidence. Received photocopy which shows front of car on double yellows, does not show any signs banning parking here. Cars have parked there since store opened so this is a new directive. Would I be correct in refusing the payment and appealing to Smart Parking Ltd.
Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Traffic Law
Expert:  Vincent2013 replied 3 years ago.

Hi, thanks for your question. My name's XXXXX XXXXX I'm going to assist you with it.


Private companies can't punish individuals with parking penalties. The original notice would have been a private land fine based on an allegation of breach of the terms of a contract formed when the vehicle was parked, along with an offer to settle for a specific sum in order to avoid a civil claim for damages.


The registered keeper of a vehicle is now liable for such a breach if they don't disclose the details of the driver. This simply means that the claim can be brought against the registered keeper of the vehicle, making it easier to identify a defendant.


If correspondence relating to a private land fine is ignored, the chances that they will actually bring a claim are fairly low. There are (of course) no guarantees but it would not make financial sense for them to bring a claim in every case. If they did, the amount of the claim can only be for the sum of the fine and a small fee for issuing the claim. They have no claim for legal or debt collection costs.


To be successful in a claim they would need to show that their signage was adequate to create a contract and to incorporate the relevant terms that they allege were breached (e.g. rules relating to markings etc.). Crucially, they can also only claim for the loss they sustained as a result of the breach and they must prove this loss. This amount will not necessarily be the same as the figure they have determined as a penalty and is probably much smaller.


In additional to any internal appeal, if the company is an Approved Operator of the British Parking Association (which can be checked here:, a free appeals process is provided by the Parking On Private Land Appeals service (POPLA).


However, as I say, the charge is not an enforceable penalty that has to be appealed or otherwise challenged by you. It is perfectly permissible to put the parking company to proof on liability and damages for breach of contract by waiting to see if they issue a claim. If a claim is brought it can either be defended or liability could be admitted in part by offering of a small amount to compensate their loss (on the basis that the full fine itself is not representative of such loss and is punitive, unfair and unreasonable).


I hope that's helpful. Please let me know if I can clarify anything.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
< Previous | Next >
  • Thank you so much for your help. Your answers were really useful and came back so quickly. Great! Maggie
  • A quick response, a succinct and helpful answer in simple English. I believe I can now confront the counter party with confidence -- worth the 30 bucks! Rick
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C.
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther

Meet The Experts:

  • Jo C.

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice.
< Previous | Next >
  • Jo C.'s Avatar

    Jo C.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Over 5 years in practice.
  • Max Lowry's Avatar

    Max Lowry


    Satisfied Customers:

    LLB, 10 years post qualification experience
  • Kasare's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Solicitor, 10 yrs plus experience in civil litigation, employment and family law.
  • Joshua's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    LL.B (Hons), Higher Prof. Dip. Law & Practice
  • Alice H's Avatar

    Alice H


    Satisfied Customers:

    Partner in national law firm
  • Jamie-Law's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

  • /img/opt/shirt.png LondonlawyerJ's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    I am a solicitor with particular expertise in road traffic law.