How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Ben Jones Your Own Question
Ben Jones
Ben Jones, UK Lawyer
Category: Employment Law
Satisfied Customers: 49821
Experience:  Qualified Employment Solicitor - Please start your question with 'For Ben Jones'
Type Your Employment Law Question Here...
Ben Jones is online now

A gentleman was tuped over to our business in April 2007.

This answer was rated:

A gentleman was tuped over to our business in April 2007. Part of his accepted Terms and Conditions upon transfer according to the documents I have available is that he received overtime after he works his contracted hours of 24 per week (mon,Wed,Thur). Our part time employees are permitted to worked up to 37.5 before overtime premiums kick in anything worked extra over their part time hours is paid at Basic rate until they reach 37.5. Are we able with notice to change the gentlemans TUPE terms and conditions to be more reflective of our own terms at all ?

Hello, my name is***** am a qualified lawyer and it is my pleasure to assist you with your question today.

Customer: replied 1 year ago.

What can I provide you with ?

Is the employee reluctant to change his current terms and conditions?

Customer: replied 1 year ago.

He is currently unaware, the question was raised by a director who is looking at various costs within our company at this present time.

OK thank you, ***** ***** it with me. I am in court today so will prepare my advice during the day and get back to you at the earliest opportunity. There is no need to wait here as you will receive an email when I have responded. Thank you.

Customer: replied 1 year ago.

Perfect - Thank You

No problem at all.

Many thanks for your patience. The issue here is that under Regulation 4(4) of TUPE any changes as a result of the transfer are automatically void, unless the employer can show they were in no way connected to the transfer or if they were necessary for an economic, technical or organisational reason (ETO reason) subject to employee agreement or the terms of the contract permitting the change.

Some employers may try and justify changes by arguing that they are needed due to harmonisation and therefore rely on an ETO reason. However, Government guidance and case law has restricted the application of harmonisation as a genuine reason to amend a person's terms of employment. Harmonisation will only be a valid reason if there is a change in the workforce and this must involve change in the numbers, or possibly functions, of the employees. In practice, relatively few contractual changes would involve such changes so harmonisation will rarely be used as a justifiable reason.

So you are risking these changes being automatically void because they would be connected to the transfer and will not be for an ETO reason. You can still propose the changes you wish to make and try to get his consent, however if he refuses it may be best to accept them as they are, otherwise it could give rise to a constructive dismissal claim, where he is forced to resign due to this.

I hope this has answered your query. I would be grateful if you could please take a second to leave a positive rating (3, 4 or 5 stars) as that is an important part of our process and recognises the time I have spent assisting you. If you need me to clarify anything before you go - please get back to me on here and I will assist further as best as I can. Thank you

Ben Jones and other Employment Law Specialists are ready to help you