You have a dependent child and therefore you would be able to make an application under part 4 of the Family Law Act to continue to live in the property even if your name is ***** ***** the title deed or mortgage.
You may have a financial interest in the property by virtue of your contributions although indirect contributions such as food et cetera are more difficult to account for unless without those payments, your partner could not afford the house.
Whether you would get GBP60,000 out of the equity would depend on what contributions you have made although as I said earlier, with a dependent child of the relationship, the chance of him getting you out of the property is remote and indeed it could work the other way where he ends up out of his own property if he starts to be awkward. It would be completely different if you did not have a dependent child of the relationship.
With regard to him pushing you around
A person who believes that they are being bullied or who has been a victim of domestic violence or coercive controlling behaviour, can apply to court for a non-molestation order to prevent the other person coming within 100 m of them and an occupation order for the alleged perpetrator to move out of the house.
Here are the government webpages on exactly this subject. https://www.gov.uk/injunction-domestic-violence.
A range of people can apply to the court: spouses, cohabitants and ex-cohabitants, people living in the same household (but not employees), tenants, lodgers, boarders, and certain relatives such as parents grandparents, in-laws, brothers sisters, and engaged couples. So basically people who are in a close relationship either physically or family or living together whether that’s in a relationship or just the same house.
There doesn't actually have to be physical violence per se because there can be coercive behaviour for example as you will read in this excellent article: D
If living arrangements are involved, it is very often impractical to live in the same house and it would very often be allied to an occupation order which defines or regulates the rights of occupation of property by the parties involved.
Many landlords will not change the name of the tenancy agreement for example without a Occupation Order.
It always helps if a report was made to the police recently because that is good evidence that this actually happened. The reason is that to report something to the police which hasn’t happened is a serious offence of wasting police time and/or attempting to pervert the course of justice which potentially carries a short jail sentence. So the civil court will take more notice if it has been reported to the police.
Having said that, the civil court will normally err on the side of caution and grant the order. However if the order is applied for based upon fabricated facts and that comes out in the wash, that is also perverting the course of justice and contempt of court and also potentially carries a jail sentence.
It is one of the few areas of law which legal aid is still available in certain circumstances so it is certainly worthwhile contacting the solicitor in the first instance.
As there is usually some urgency with these kind of applications, it can be done on an emergency basis and there is the facility on the form to do that. An applicant can also attach a Certificate of Urgency (a letter with that heading) explaining why this should be in court on an emergency basis, usually within a day or so.
These applications are usually made “ex parte” which means that the other side doesn’t get notice. What I mean by that is that they are not told “if you do this again we will make an application to court”.
The first they know about it is when the applicant gets the order and they are given the order.
The effect of the order is exactly the same as a restraining order to restraining order is something applied for by the police/CPS through the magistrates court (or exceptionally the Crown Court) whereas a non-molestation order is through the family/civil court.
Section 1 of the Domestic Violence, Crime & Victims Act 2004 May the breach of a non-molestation order a criminal offence. It’s serious stuff.
Thank you for letting me assist you with your legal question. I am glad that I was able to help.
I am not certain whether that answers the question for you or not, but I am happy to answer any specific points arising from this.
It will be my pleasure to help you again either further with this or any future questions you have