I understand committing a fraud should be punished, but why wouldn't they consider it as ignorance and a mistake not to inform them about a capital that is not belonging to my self, I have evidence that this money belongs to my father who was obliged to give me access to this money so I can pay for my university expenses and I spent more than my share of it and the remaining of this money still belongs to my father.
The evidence that I have is actually a letter from a British court which was dealing with my brother's visa refuse case which resulted in granting a visa to my brother. The latter clearly confirms that this money was being spent on my as well as my two brothers higher education study .
Also,I would like to inform you, that the case is going to Magistrate court and not crown court.
I can show clearly that the money which was in this account ( the joint account between my wife and my brother which had the capital they are talking about and accusing me about ) belongs totally to my brother. As I can show that this money was drawn totally to my brother's sole account twice , is not this an evidence that this money is my brother's money ? .
Questions are as follows:
1- How would this affect the sentence ?
2- Can this case still go to Crown court ?
3- What is my chance of being not guilty ?