PLEASE SEE MY COMMENTS BELOW IN UPPER CASE WITHIN
THE BODY OF THE EMAIL SENT BY THE CHAIRMAN
This new application appears very similar to last year's application, but of particular concern is the fact that the proposed siting of the new house is even closer to Mountview Road than in the earlier application.
THE PLANS SHOW THE HOUSE TO BE FURTHER AWAY.
On the current Site and Location Plan the 30 feet line from the site boundary (which is where we contend the building line runs from) is no longer shown - the only 30 feet line shown is that from the edge of the carriageway, and even this is infringed to a greater degree than previously.
THE PLANS SHOW THIS 30 FEET LINE IS NOT INFRINGED TO A GREATER DEGREE
RHRA will therefore be objecting to this application in a similar manner to their earlier objection.
We have previously notified the developer that RHRA will not permit the new cross-overs proposed even if planning permission is obtained unless the 30 feet building line, calculated from the site boundary, is respected.
THE COVENANTS OF THE HOUSE STATE;
"NO BUILDING OR ERECTIONEXCEPT BOUNDARY FENCES OR WALLS SHALL AT ANY TIME BE ERECTED ON THE LAND HEREBY CONVEYED WITHIN 30 FEET (EXCLUSIVE OF BAY WINDOWS) FROM ANY EXISTING OR FUTURE ROADS THAT MAY BE ON RUXLEY LODGE ESTATE."
Incidentally, I've received an email from RHRA chairman this morning refusing to send our a retraction statement.