How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask JGM Your Own Question
JGM, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 12088
Experience:  30 years as a practising solicitor.
Type Your Law Question Here...
JGM is online now

Privilege: Do you have legal privilege if you are accusing

This answer was rated:

Privilege: Do you have legal privilege if you are accusing someone, or others of something for the purposes of initiating litigation.

I would like to know.. in cases such as deformation that potentially involve more that one defendant.To establish the facts you essentially have to pass information to one defendant referring to another or each other (or several) as to what has happened.

In doing so you essentially accuse one person of potentially (as it is not yet proven) committing something and therefore potentially defame them.

Could you not therefore potentially reduce\diminish your own claim and they could immediately argue back now you've said "that" kinda tit for tat?

So the Q. is - Is the accusation or proposal of such privileged? EG I say you and John said I was a thief, in writing to you and saying "that" I defame John by saying he said it as well to you?

is that privileged? or protected?
Thank you for your question.

The rule on this is quite straightforward. Any statements made in court proceedings, whether in the written summons or subsequent written pleadings or whether in the courtroom, are covered by privilege and are not actionable by way of defamation.

Any statements made between persons outwith such proceedings are not privileged and could be actionable if found to be untrue.

Happy to discuss further.

Please leave a positive response so that I am credited for my time.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

SO in my example where I say you and John said I was a thief, in writing to you and saying "that john also said I was a thief" I defame John?


Even if this is to describe when or where, in maybe a cease and desist letter -


With your answer - As this is outside court and not yet litigated, John would now have a equal valid case for being defamed.

That is all correct. A letter is not privileged.
Customer: replied 3 years ago.

So how would you explain the facts in this instance without recrimination?

If they are facts there should not be any recrimination.

Defamation is the making of false statements. If you make false statements you run the risk of being sued.
JGM and 3 other Law Specialists are ready to help you