Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
My original complaint was ignored for several months. I sent emails to the officer who was supposed to be looking into my complaint. None of these where answered. I then received a sort blunt email. I complained again. It was then that this email and others where hacked.
This is a long story. I received a phone call from a Nottingham Police Officer, in which I was Accused of bombarding Joanne Maye with threatening, abusive, and improper letters. I denied this. I was told over the phone that i was being Cautioned anyway. I am in Sheffield, not Nottingham, It has since been admitted that I am in no way guilty of anything.
harassment was not mentioned until later. When it was claimed that this phone call was a friendly word of advice. It is now admitted there was no harassment. I had previously been called a liar by joanne maye. I had invited her and her partner to a pre release screening of a film I had produced. Joanne had been a previous girlfriend but that was when we where at Uni. and had finished in 1988. As such it is not a factor.
No I was not told to stop contacting her. I was called a liar, the invite offered a chance to meet people who could show that this was not the case. I received no reply. Since I had asked for a reply so that I could sort out seating numbers. I wrote again asking why no reply?
No, the Officer told me I was being Cautioned, for bombarding her with threatening, abusive, and improper letters.
My email has been hacked. There is a hidden attachment that has not been explained with the email of the 20/12/10. until the logs related to this email are checked my claim of hacking has not been properly investigated. This is a serious matter. The cover up is in my mind the main thing. Police officers cannot be allowed to do these criminal acts!!
I have not sent any emails to joanne maye. Just the two letters.
Because I complained about emails to the Notts Officer had been unanswered, and then with out any input from myself I was bluntly told nothing had happened. I believe Joanne Maye tried to set me up with a Police Caution, The Police had not done their job properly, and obtained some evidence (Letter I had written, or statement from Joanne.) So they where now in a position where they could not "Give her a slap on the wrist" for her actions. So bullying me into dropping this and covering up what had happened was their response.
The hacking of my emails was done to cover up their incompetent, and alter the rude email they had sent to me. By doing this my email boxes have been left in a total mess. They where in short getting rid of their mistakes with no regards to the truth.
So why hack my email? Maybe they did it just for the laugh. What would I need to get access to the logs?
If i could show that the hidden attachment was generating part of the email of the 20/12/10. Would that do?
If I got arrested for some minor issue could I insist in court that the reason for this, was my email being hacked, and so have the logs produced? What would I need?
The emails I am talking about are on the police network. This is a secure network. If they have not hacked it, why haven't they investigated to find out who has? This would involve of course viewing the logs concerned. Am I to take it that the Police are protected from any come back for criminal activies? What evidence do I need?
Hacking my email is a crime. Why hasn't this been investigated? To investigate they would need to look at the logs concerned. Can I get a court order to obtain these logs.
I thought crime was taken seriously? No matter what the vehicle? Particularly when I am accusing police of altering evidence, and colluding at an inter force level to suppress the truth?
If I got a expert to view the content of the hidden attachment and he can show that this attachment is generating (In whole or in part) the email of the 20/12/10. Therefore this email was not being accessed from the correct location? Would that help?
who and what is the information commissioner? How can the commissioner be contacted?
Could I not use the new information gained by the attachment study,. To reopen the IPCC case?
I have been told that a case, some years ago, was an almost mirror of the situation that I find myself in occurred. Same false address, and emails hacked, same Police Station. This case came to court after Surrey Police raided the police station and took computers. How would he have got that result? What possible routes could he have taken to get this result? I am currently try to track down records of that case.