Law
Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
Kyle was 16 in sept 2003 when he put claim in kyle had gone in army 5th sept .graydon was 12 and Bradley was 8. I made an appeal they said they wanted £9 of the £109 . The case was dropped . I was told in 2005 there was an outstanding sum of about £76 they have never told me what that sum was for but went to my employer and told them they had to take 3 equal payments and then it should have been a 1 off payment of about £1.76 but they told my employer it was an ongoing sum .after I showed the pay department my letter they sorted it with the CSA and I had the sum returned to me by chequestions from the CSA. I had been told he could reaply which he did in April 2007. Graydon came to live with me in June 2007. He has ADHD, aspbergers and toureters. From that time they took maintenance from my carers allowance. Graydon at a later date moved out for a while and when he moved back in I never claimed again.I have had periods where I have not worked in April 2012 I had a knee replacement and they just payments from that money. In September 2012 Bradley the youngest got a job with Deloit from that date till May 2014 Bradley had lived there but they had not declared the income to the housing or the benefits agency.in may his second wife left which then Bradley had to move out because his dad would not get the housing benefits paid and the housing would also find that there was almost a £20000 income that had not been declared. In 2008 the CSA said that the claim would be back dated.this is point I really do not agree from April 2007 I believe I owe in the region of £400 . In a letter dated June 6th 2014 they claim I owe £2539.32 . In the breakdown of that account they claimed I owed from 3/09/2003 till 19/06/2007. 198 weeks of £9 . That £9 had been the organ sum for 3 children . It really does get very complicated. It is the period between 2003 and April 2007 I totally disagree with. He had made an illegal claim against me and believe me it was totally out of malice and then in 2008 after graydon had been with me for a year they decide to back date to the original claim. Another thing I object to is that if I was employed they would have gone straight to my employer and would have taken money straight from my wages. This is the reason I have not been officially working nor am I claiming benefits. At present I earn £46 that the CSA do not know about . I need to find work as we are struggling with the present financial climate. I have not claimed benefits or paid national insurance contribution so I fear that I am not eligible and I'm now in need of another knee replacement. . My X husband really is a nasty piece of work. He stopped me from seeing my own children when I left . It took 13 months going through the courts to get to see them again. The courts were very damming of my X. He remarried in Oct 2003. He has not worked since 1991
Sorry last correspondence from CSA they were investigating my earning
Yes I paid maintenance for Bradley when graydon moved in with me I had to pay £5 a week out of my carers allowance of about £52 . From that period there is sum outstanding. From 2007 till 2012 there is a sum of I believe to be in the region of £400 not too different from what they are claiming. Its them deciding in 2008 to back date to 2003 I have the problem with.
The claim was stopped when I appealed then in 2005 it was said I owed £72 they couldn't ever tell me what that Money was for. They deducted £23.44 for 3 months then a one of payment of £1.68 . The letter they sent my employer said it was to be an ongoing monthly payment. I took my letter in and the wages clerk sorted the CSA and the extra payment was returned to me by cheque. I did not hear from the CSA again until june 2007 when they said my x had re applied for child maintenance in the april of that year. On 18/10/05 I was told by Richard Ball who worked at theCSA that the case had been closed on 29/10/03
It was in 2008 they decided to back date to the original claim
I left because my husband had become severely abusive. I left with nothing but the clothes on my back. I would never have been allowed to have the children he simply would have made my life worse than he did. I was attacked in the street held against my will for several hours stalked. The list goes on. And that was after I left. I got a job as a care assistant earning very low wages it was a masive struggle single trying to keep a roof over my head.im stronger now and in hind sight there should have been some kind of organisation that could have helped then . He stopped me seeing my children he tried every way possible to make my life a misery. The children were poisoned against me. Took 13 months but I got access to my 2 youngest. The eldest I still have no contact with. I worked for a low wage till december 2007 since then ive worked small cash in hand jobs that I have declared to the tax office.. the tax office is one of the department that ive been reported to and investigated by. The CSA however fo not know about this income