How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 71129
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

A man who was self employed working injured himself

This answer was rated:

A man who was self employed working injured himself whilst on my site.he was not wearing correct protective equipment ( gloves)and shattered his thumb. He moved something that was in fixed and it fell on his hand. I am his contractor but was 20 miles away at the time on another job. Who is to blame?? He is attempting to sue me.
Thank you question. My name is ***** ***** I will try to help with this.
How did it come to fall on his thumb?
Why was he capable of moving it if it was fixed?
Customer: replied 3 years ago.
Sorry, un fixed . He lifted and positioned it in an external opening. He then attempted to move it and it fell in. Rather then leaving it to fall and get damaged ( powder coated frame) he attempted to catch it. It landed on his thumb. He was wearing no gloves ( I have other sub contractors ready to write statements.

An injury has to be reasonably foreseeable consequence of negligence or breach of a statutory duty.

What the claimant is likely to be claiming is a breach of the statutory duty to put in place a safe system of work” which includes not only providing safety equipment but also instructing people to how to use the safety equipment and monitoring the use.

This was a heavy item should have been instructed how to lift the item and given guidelines on how heavy something should be before he seeks assistance.

Provided you have all that in place and he simply ignored it then his claim is likely to fail if it gets to court. If however you don’t have all that in place or cannot prove that you have it in place because none of it is document, his claim is likely to succeed.

There is one other issue here and that is with regard to the gloves. If you can prove that it wearing the gloves would have prevented the injury or lessened you may be able to plead contributory negligence which is the situation where he is partly responsible injury and any compensation that he receives is reduced according.

You cannot delegate the statutory duty of putting in a safe system of work so if you appointed the firm to do this , and the person was still injured, it is still your company’s neck which now which is on the block.

The fact that you would 20 miles away makes no difference.

Nor is the fact that he is self-employed is relevant because he is working under your instruction and therefore you are under the duty to put in the safe system of work.

The leading case is Mc Williams v Sir William Arrol and Company, case from 1962 which is interesting because it was an injury sustained (actually it was death and the claim was brought by his estate) where the defendant employer failed to provide safety harness but the claim failed because there was sufficient proof to say that even if the employer had provided the harnesses, the employee would not have worn one.

You are also under a statutory duty to have employers liability and therefore this is something which you should pass to your insurer if you get a letter from his solicitor.

Can I clarify anything ?

Customer: replied 3 years ago.
I was very happy
Thank you. You have left a negative rating but asked information which seems inconsistent. I will be happy to carry on with this if the negative rating was a mistake. I know thats easy to do as I’ve done it myself in other categories.
Jo C. and other Law Specialists are ready to help you