How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Ash Your Own Question
Ash, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 10916
Experience:  Solicitor with 5+ years experience
Type Your Law Question Here...
Ash is online now

on a claim no A19YJ313 the claimant was told to pay the defendants

Customer Question

on a claim no A19YJ313 the claimant was told to pay the defendants cost of £1728.00. the claimant opened another claim . claim no A32YM550 to enforce this to be stayed until a hearing on the 13th of oct 2014, 0n oct 14th claim no A32YM550 was struck out but case no. A19YJ313 which was supposed to be heard alongside case A32YM550 was not heard, so is the stay still in place and has not got to be paid.
Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Ash replied 3 years ago.
Alex Watts : Hello my name is ***** ***** I will help you with this.
Alex Watts : For now please let me know why a new claim was issued to enforce costs please?
JACUSTOMER-805g10n6- :

we were told to at the time, we then realised we didnt have to but it was too late

JACUSTOMER-805g10n6- :

do you know when you will be able to answer

Alex Watts : Ok, this is yiur claim? Why was it struck out?
JACUSTOMER-805g10n6- : It was said to have no merit
Alex Watts : On what basis did it have no merit?
JACUSTOMER-805g10n6- : Havnt got the paperwork in front of me, but I just want to know if the claim no A19YJ313 is still stayed because it wasn't heard
Alex Watts : No.
Alex Watts : It is not stayed.
Alex Watts : there is no order any more staying it
Alex Watts : Does that help?
JACUSTOMER-805g10n6- :

but the case wasnt heard, does this mean it has to be paid

Alex Watts :

The original case was dealt with and there is an order for costs.

Alex Watts :

The enforcement claim was struck out only

Alex Watts :

Indeed there was no reason for a new claim for enforcement you have an existing order

Alex Watts :

Therefore it can be enforced

Alex Watts :

Does that clarify?

Alex Watts :

If this answers your question could I invite you rate my answer before you leave today.

If the system won’t let you please click reply.

Please bookmark my profile if you wish for future help: