How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 32086
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

Simester and Sullivan argue that it would be a mistake to

Customer Question

Simester and Sullivan argue that it would be a mistake to respond to the decisions in R v Campbell [1990] 93 Cr App R 350 and R v Geddes [1996] Crim LR 894 by widening the actus reus of criminal attempts. This, they argue, would “carry an undue risk of oppressive policing and unsafe convictions based on dubious convictions”. They suggest that the best way forward is instead to “craft specific offences for particular situations which presage the occurrence of serious harm” (Simester and Sullivan’s Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine (5th edn), p358). How far (if at all) do you agree?

Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Law