I have been to a business meeting and have just become available.
In reply to your answer.
I have already complained to my insurers and also complained to the head of the solicitor's handling my claim.Both insurer and solicitors being part of the same group have stated I am to blame and refuse to issue court proceedings saying I have less than a 51% chance of success.
I cannot understand why my insurer and my solicitors believe the independent witness version of events when quite clearly his statement and sketch are a complete fabrication.What is said did not happen.I did not pull out into another lane and into the path of the motorcyclist.
There was no other lane as described and indicated by the independent witness it is a lie.
The car was hit on the offside rear end while positioned 90 degrees to the westbound and eastbound traffic in slow moving traffic.
I was there to be seen.
The insurer and solicitors concerned are the Admiral group.
Please also advise regarding the 50/50 settlement offer between the parties my insurer, Admiral alleges I refused by giving them an email instruction.I have never been aware of such a settlement offer because if I was I would have accepted such.Admiral are lying for reasons known to themselves. Why would they carry on like this ? Admiral are settling the other side's claim in full with personal injury cost of £18000.00 and motorbike cost of £4000.00 a low impact collision,no ambulance ,no police,the other gut said he was not injured and talked to other bikers at the scene.
I am not sure how the financial ombudsman could assist,there is clearly fraud involved in this case and although I am fully comprehensive and have paid my excess I believe the other side are getting away with ' highway robbery '
I look forward to your reply.