How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 71130
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now
This answer was rated:

Inc January I had a slight accident with my car and another

car in a leisure centre... Show More
car in a leisure centre car park.
There was a witness, but the lady involve in the accident said she was not needed and sent her away. In her statement she also claims that I failed to stop at a Give Way sign, but there are no Give Way signs in the car park. She also produced a friend who witnessed the accident and claims I said I did not see the second car. The accident was on CCTV but was erased before my insurers could veiw it. I have been told I can go to court or pay 50% of costs. I do not want to go to court but feel aggrieved my case is based on a lie and lost CCTV. Dianne
Show Less
Ask Your Own Law Question
Thank you for your question. My name is ***** ***** I will try to help with this.
What would you like to know about this please?
Customer reply replied 2 years ago.
Do I accept the 50/50 offer? I feel this is not right since the cctv coverage would have solved the problem, and I could not stop at a Give Way sign that does not exist, and I am sceptical about the word of the witness who suddenly emerged. Dianne
Well, ultimately if you are not willing to go to court is the only option.
Your insurers are liable on your behalf and they are making a risk assessment of the merits of the case. Realistically, without CCTV and with a witness that is adverse to you, even if she is biased, it is likely that you would lose and so they are making offers.
Whether the CCTV would assist or not the fact remains that it does not exist now and your insurance company are dealing in risks and their management.
You can go to court but probably there is a caveat in your insurance that renders you personally liable for costs if you do.
I'm very sorry but that is your position.
Can I clarify anything for you?