How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 71142
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

Schools Admissions Appeal. At the appeal today the panel accepted

This answer was rated:

Schools Admissions Appeal. At the appeal today the panel accepted that the school had not followed the mandatory procedure laid down in the School Admission Appeals Code. The school had breached sections 2.3 (d) and 2.7.
They then stated that this is not a breach of the Admissions Code for Schools and that it was not grounds to find in our favour. Therefore, the appeal was rejected. An apology was offered.
If there is a mandatory proscribed procedure that MUST be followed and then is not - why is there no sanction in favour of the appellant? What is the point of a mandatory legal procedure laid down in The Schools Appeals Code?
The school is Voluntary Aided, The Governor attended and the application was for a year 4 place.
Thank you for your question. My name is ***** ***** I will try to help with this.
I'm not sure what your question is?
Obviously we cannot comment on the merits of the law.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
There is a mandatory Schools Appeals Code. This was not followed. The school admitted this. What then should be the outcome of not following the mandatory procedure laid down in law.?If no sanction or prescribed outcome, what is the point of having it as law? If I, as the appellant, had not followed the mandatory procedure then my appeal would have been rejected. The school does not follow the mandatory procedure and then???
Well, lots of laws are pointless. Mostly they are about vote winners for Government rather than achieving what is right. That is the disadvantage of rule by the ballot box I'm afraid.
However, the School Admissions Appeals Code is not a statute. It is just a statutory instrument and so secondary legislation.
In any event, procedural failures are usually an issue for costs rather than for consideration during the substantive hearing which deals with the contested facts.
Can I clarify anything for you?
Jo C. and other Law Specialists are ready to help you