How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 71050
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

I have been sent a summons to appear in court, traffic

This answer was rated:

I have been sent a summons to appear in court, for a traffic violation, going through a red traffic light. The vehicle was photographed at the junction.
The incident happened at night, while roadworks were in place, a lane was closed, lined with bollards, flashing orange lights hung on them. The traffic light is on a curve, like a slip road. The traffic light in question was inside the roadworks and appeared to me (erroneously) to be out of operation and part of the roadworks. It was dark, was confused and went through the red light. Does it make sense to make a not guilty plea based on these extenuating circumstances? Is this reason strong enough to support the plea? Would the judge listen to such an argument?

are you prepared to risk costs?

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
What is a typical amount for costs?

After a trial probably £400-£600.

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
By costs do you mean the trial costs, or the fine I have to pay if found guilty? Or both?

No, the fine would be an additional amount. Probably around £100-£300 plus costs.

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
OK, to summarise. If I Iose the case, then I pay approximately £600-£800. Yes, I am prepared to take this risk. Can you give an opinion whether the case is in my favour?

Oh well, the chances are never really very good.

S36 RTA is an offence of strict liability. Come what may, you went through a red light.

The only challenge is that the lights were not displayed as the law requires and various cases have been very damaging upon that point.

They only have to show that the lights were displayed in such a way that the reasonably observant motorist would have understood they applied to him.

If they can get over that hurdle their obligations are met.

Whether they can or not depends really on the physical location and the layout.

Also, you need to bear in mind that Magistrates are generally biased in favour of the Crown.

Can I clarify anything for you?


Customer: replied 1 year ago.
OK, you have answered the question indirectly. A not guilty plea is not going to be accepted or work. I think I will plead guilty and try to explain the workroads as extenuating circumstances. Thanks for your help

I think you are right in these circumstances.

It is not usually worth the risk.

Jo C. and 3 other Law Specialists are ready to help you