How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Jo C. Your Own Question
Jo C.
Jo C., Barrister
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 71146
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice
Type Your Law Question Here...
Jo C. is online now

I have just ended the tenancy on a property and, due to a

This answer was rated:

I have just ended the tenancy on a property and, due to a number of burns on the carpet, the landlord wishes to charge me for a completely new carpet. I queried this, saying that I should only be responsible for a percentage of the carpet as it wasn't brand new when I moved in. If i didnt agree to this, he then threatened to take me to court and sue me for various other things he has found in the property which I have not left to his satisfaction along including his time etc which somehow he decided would amount to over £5000? I just wanted to know where i stand with this.
Thanks in advance

What other complaints are there?

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Other complaints?

For which he is proposing to sue?

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
He said the the veneer on the bottom of some of the doors had been damaged due to door stops being used. When i pointed out that the doorstops were in the flat when we moved in, he simply said that I would have to prove that in court. A couple of other smaller things as well but i cant remember the exact details (quite a heated conversation!)
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Along with his time (he said £400/hour?!) and loss of rent despite him telling me the flat had new tenants

He does have a claim for damage to the carpet but he cannot claim the full retail price of the carpet. If an item is old it cannot be replaced with new. There would be a reduction of 20% for every year of the carpet's life.

Realistically he doesn't have a claim for the veneer either. Door stops are designed to be used. That is their purpose.

He also cannot claim £400 an hour. He might bet some administration costs but not £400 an hour.

Can I clarify anything for you?


Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Thanks Jo, I am most worried about if i stand my ground with him and (eventually) end up in court that he will (somehow?) find a way to sue me for thousands as opposed to just paying for the carpet now (around £600) out of my deposit.

Well, he may do that. People do bring weak claims sometimes.

The important thing is that it won't succeed though.

He just plain doesn't have a claim unless he is going to lie through his teeth.

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
He is prepared to lie through his teeth- hence what he said about the doorstops!

Well, he isn't lying over that?

He is just blaming you for using something that he provided which is just wrong in law.

Customer: replied 1 year ago.
He said that I would have to prove that he didn't provide the doorstops

Actually he would have to prove that he didn't but it is only to the civil standard.

Even if he could do that though it still would not be thousands of pounds.

Jo C. and other Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 1 year ago.
Thanks for your help Jo