If you are saying that they are now looking for money in respect of a period where you had vacated the property and that you would have been liable if it was still empty and you accept that, BUT that before the end of the period (that you would be liable for in respect of the 994.92) they had a new student in the accommodation who is presumably paying rent and therefore, they would in effect to be getting paid twice, then they are not entitled to recover rent from the tenant in occupations and also payment from you under the terms of your rental agreement.
It doesn’t matter whether you have disorderly conduct or can’t pay or can pay or you are a multimillionaire, they are not entitled to be paid twice for the same accommodation,
Can I clarify anything else for you?
I’m happy to answer any specific points arising from this.
Please take a moment to look at the top right hand corner of the page and rate my service by clicking one of the stars at the top of the screen. It’s important you use the rating service because that gives me credit. It doesn’t just give me a pat on the head! (Although there is an incentive scheme where the more five-star ratings I get, I do actually get a pat on the head! :-)) All you need to do is press Submit. Thank you.
If you still need any point clarifying, I will still reply because the thread does not close.