Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
Hi, welcome to JustAnswer. My name is*****’m a barrister with 12 years of experience and I am happy to help with your question today.
There is an argument that she was negligent and therefore would be liable for the actual cost although it won't be anything like £2k.
I'm not sure what he intends to report to the police. i can't immediately see a crime although I suppose he may lie through his teeth. People do sometimes.
The fact that she has lied only really goes to credibility. Since there isn't really a dispute here that isn't important at this stage.
Can I clarify anything for you?
Well, it depends if he is going to lie.
Or if there is more to this.
He could sue you on the basis that you failed to control her but there is no real basis for that given her age.
But a CCJ will stop her joining the army. The forces are unreasonable about debt.
Then it would depend on her level of vetting.
And she would still have to be untruthful on the application forms which is generally a mistake.
A better option would be to be honest and make the point it was a dispute over liability not poor money management.
You would have to pay within 28 days of judgment for it to be removed.
It isn't going to be anything like £2k.
Dogs have a value to their owners that is greater than the sum they are worth but in law the compensation is the value of the dog. It is not the cost of replacing the dog with a new puppy which, actually, would also not cost £2k.
if people had any interest in the welfare of dogs at all they would adopt rather than buy from breeders anyway but even if they are intent, a French bulldog does not cost £2k.