Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
Hi, welcome to JustAnswer. My name is*****’m a barrister with 12 years of experience and I am happy to help with your question today.
Sorry for the delay.
What would you like to know about this?
Do you know what this other woman has alleged?
The risk of refusing the warning is this. There is a lesser offence under the Dangers Dogs Act 1991 of placing a person in reasonable fear of injury. The wording is a bit more complicated than that but that is it basically.
I don't know whether you would be prosecuted or not. They do not commonly bring ill considered prosecutions with this particular offence now but that is the risk.
Also, there is an outside risk of being sued but they would need a vet's bill to recover.
If this is basically a dog scrap then you might well succeed at court but that is the risk that you take.
I suppose it depends on your appetite for risk.
Can I clarify anything for you?
That is certainly true.
People do that sometimes I'm afraid.
I suppose it depends on the risk you want to take.
Obviously the worst case scenario is that you are prosecuted and the Bench believe his lies.
Worst case scenario tends not to happen but you might want to know the risk
It would probably be a fine or a community order but there is the risk of a destruction order for your dog.
That isn't likely as there is the option of a contigent destruction order but you might want to know the risk.