Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!
Welcome to Just Answer.
I will be happy to assist with your question today. I need some time to consider this and compose a response. There is NO need to wait online because you will get an email when I respond. Sometimes it will be minutes, sometimes longer.
I apologise for any unavoidable delay, but rest assured I have not forgotten your question.
for clarity -
was the email address you sent your normal/usual email address as you received their email?
did they then receive your email(s)?
Provided you have the copy of the email containing the address for service and it went to the correct address and the second copy in response, I think it unlikely that the judgement would be reinstated.
I assume that you have made an application to set aside the judgement.
Further, just because there was no address for service doesn’t necessarily mean that the other side have been disadvantaged unless there were actually documents that needed serving in which they couldn’t serve because they haven’t got an address.
Notwithstanding the Coronavirus situation, people seem to have become fixed over the last couple of years in avoiding sending things by post and doing it by email. My personal view is that I want a piece of paper in the post. Particularly with regard to service of documents because the last thing I want is a whole load of emails which I have to print out to put on a file.
It’s not your fault if the recipient’s spam filter has put your email into a junk box.
However what is then of more concern is that if you sent it to the other side and the court, that the court hasn’t received it because of the court hasn’t received it then clearly, you didn’t send it for whatever reason.
In that case, you didn’t send it and your in breach of the order, regardless of the reason.
However as you say, no documents were served so it somewhat academic albeit still a breach of the order but in my opinion it would not be a reason to get the original judgement reinstated because they have not been disadvantaged in their position has not been prejudiced.
If they make the application, you need to oppose it.