How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • Go back-and-forth until satisfied
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Ben Jones Your Own Question
Ben Jones
Ben Jones, UK Lawyer
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 70829
Experience:  Qualified Solicitor
Type Your Law Question Here...
Ben Jones is online now

My husband had a disciplinary hearing in January this year

Customer Question

My husband had a disciplinary hearing in January this year regarding a verbal altercation between him and another colleague and was given a 12 month Final Written Warning. On Monday afternoon this week he was advised by his foreman that he was suspended and to go home without being given a reason as to why. He tried without success to contact his line manager and finally his line manager sent him a txt last night advising that letters would be in the post for him and that he would email the letters across which he did. The first letter is headed 'Investigation' and is regarding my husband supposedly acting aggressively towards his foreman when in a meeting with him last week on Thursday 8th October which according to my husband isn't true. He is to attend a hearing on Tuesday 20th October. The second letter is a 'suspension' letter accusing my husband of incompetence and that multiple serious issues were found by an external electrical contractor that they believe to have been installed by him - he is an electrician and has worked for this company for 11 and a half years and has been an electrician for almost 40 years. This matter is currently under investigation and no date has been set for a hearing. My husband is convinced that he will be dismissed and thinks that maybe for him to resign would be the best thing. We are not sure what is the best thing to do.
JA: Was the disciplinary action discussed with a manager or HR? Or with a lawyer?
Customer: Which one? December or what's happening now?
JA: Does the workplace operate with employees, freelancers, consultants, contractors or with unionised employees?
Customer: He works for a private school and there is another full time electrician and there are often external electrical contractors there too
JA: Anything else you want the Lawyer to know before I connect you?
Customer: Not that I can think of
Submitted: 7 days ago.
Category: Law
Expert:  Ben Jones replied 7 days ago.

Hello, I’m Ben. It’s my pleasure to assist you today. I may also ask for some preliminary information to help me determine the legal position.

Customer: replied 7 days ago.
That's fine
Expert:  Ben Jones replied 7 days ago.

I am sorry to hear of the situation your husband is in. Can I just check, what is he ideally hoping for given the circumstances?

Customer: replied 7 days ago.
He is convinced that he will be fired as there isn't any way he can prove that he hasn't done the installations. He is wondering if it wouldn't be better for him to resign or should he go through with the disciplinary hearings.
Customer: replied 7 days ago.
are you there?
Expert:  Ben Jones replied 7 days ago.

OK I understand and thank you for providing this information. Please do not worry and leave it with me for now; I will get back to you with my answer as soon as I can, which will be at some point today. The system will notify you when this happens. Please do not reply in the meantime as this may unnecessarily delay my response. Many thanks.

Expert:  Ben Jones replied 7 days ago.

Many thanks for your patience, I am pleased to be able to continue assisting with your query now. First of all, I am sorry to hear about the issues you have experienced in your situation.

He is free to resign at any time and the employer cannot prevent that from happening. However, on resignation, he would be expected to honour his notice period, unless it is mutually agreed with the employer for him to be let go with immediate effect. If he has to work his notice period, the employer can still proceed with the disciplinary process during the notice period and in the event he is found guilty of gross misconduct, he may also be dismissed with immediate effect. That would make the official reason for termination dismissal, rather than resignation. I would, however hope that the fact he is leaving anyway will prompt the employer not to pursue a disciplinary any further and just let him leave.

If he cannot agree on a mutual early release, and it looks like the employer will be proceeding with the disciplinary even once he has resigned, then the following process will apply:

Alleged misconduct is a common reason for dismissing an employee and it is also one of the potentially fair reasons for dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996. It could be either due to a single serious act of misconduct or a series of less serious acts over a period of time.

In order to justify that dismissal on grounds of misconduct was fair, the law requires that the employer:

- Conducts a reasonable investigation

- Follows a fair disciplinary procedure

- Has genuine belief the employee was guilty; and

- Shows that dismissal was a decision that a reasonable employer would have taken in the circumstances

In addition, the employer is expected to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance procedures, which can be incorporated into their own disciplinary policy. It sets out various steps along the process which the employer has to follow to ensure the process is fair.

1. Investigation – the employer must conduct a reasonable investigation first. This could include interviewing the employee or other witnesses who may have relevant information. What is reasonable depends entirely on the circumstances and the nature and seriousness of the allegations. The more serious or complex these are, the more detailed the investigation needs to be. Conversely, simple matters will only require a simple investigation which can be completed in a day. The employer is not legally required to provide full details of the allegations prior to an investigatory meeting taking place.

2. Disciplinary hearing - if the investigation provides sufficient evidence of misconduct, the employee may be invited to attend a formal disciplinary hearing to answer these allegations. They must be given reasonable notice of the hearing, together with details of the allegations and any evidence to be used against them. They have the legal right to be accompanied at the hearing by a trade union representative or a workplace colleague.

3. Decision - following the disciplinary hearing and once the employer has had a chance to consider the employee’s response, they can make a decision on the outcome. If the employer holds a genuine belief that the employee was guilty, then they can go ahead and formally penalise them.

4. Penalty – this has to be a decision, which a reasonable employer would have taken in the circumstances. When deciding on the appropriate penalty, the employer should consider the nature and seriousness of the offence, any mitigating factors and the employee's length of service and disciplinary record. Other aspects, like expressing remorse and apologising and there being evidence the issues were innocent or unintentional should also help to a degree.

In summary, the requirements of proof are not as stringent as in criminal law and an employer is not expected to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the alleged misconduct had definitely occurred. A decision on the balance of probabilities will be sufficient and a dismissal can be fair if the employer can show that it had met the above criteria, namely conducting a reasonable investigation, following a fair procedure and holding a genuine belief that the employee was guilty. Finally, it must show that dismissal was an outcome, which a reasonable employer would have taken in the circumstances.

If there is evidence that the employer has not followed a fair procedure as outlined above, the outcome can be formally appealed with the employer. After that, a claim for unfair dismissal can potentially be made in the Employment Tribunal. There are two main requirements to claim: the employee must have at least 2 years' continuous service with the employer and the claim must be made within 3 months of the official date of termination.

Hopefully, I have answered your query in a way that is simple and easy to understand. If anything remains unclear, I will be more than happy to clarify it for you. In the meantime, thank you once again for using our services.

Expert:  Ben Jones replied 7 days ago.

I hope that your query has been answered to your satisfaction. I just wanted to take this opportunity to remind you that if you needed any further clarification with this query, you should not hesitate to contact me and I will be happy to help. For now, thank you for using our services.