I spoke with you earlier a few weeks ago in relation to

Hi I spoke with you earlier a few weeks ago in relation to legal expenses not being upheld through my house insurance policy, relating to defects on my new build. I had to involve the ombudsmanThe ombudsman upheld my claim on two aspects. (1) re review my claim without the exclusion previously stated and if upheld pay my expenses and (2) if not upheld pay any legal fees incurred for legal assistance to the point of indicating a successful caseThe company concerned however are still proving difficult with me and are arguing still.The current argument is over the fact that the ombudsman stated that regardless of whether or not my claim is upheld that I be paid for any legal advice to the point of proving a reasonable chance of success.The costs schedule I have given the company is all my costs to date inc what I had to pay for PoC to be filed.Whilst I appreciate this item may be struck off all of the other costs I feel are relevant because there has been the necessity to organise expert witnesses, reports, Scott schedules to determine impacts of the situation etc etc.The company are trying to say these should not be included.Can I argue that they are because without all of the knowledge I have had to gain along the way to determine my success rate I have had to go through these processes without this whilst I may have had a good case it is simply not black and white and a case of a few hours legal chat to dissident this case/claim and I feel they are being pushy over what they are now still trying to dictate