How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site. Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Remus2004 Your Own Question
Remus2004, Barrister
Category: Property Law
Satisfied Customers: 71051
Experience:  Over 5 years in practice.
Type Your Property Law Question Here...
Remus2004 is online now

A tenant with a assured short hold tenancy agreement does not

This answer was rated:

a tenant with a assured short hold tenancy agreement does not live on the premises and is running a business throughout the rented premises.
Is this legal
Thank you for your question. My name is ***** ***** I will try to help with this.
does it exclude business use?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

"To use the property as a single private dwelling and not to permit any other use."

I am about to buy said premises later this week at auction.

I wouldn't get involved in that if I were you. An encumbered property is always problematic.
If that is right then he is putting it to a use not permitted and you could seek a possession order on that basis.
However, you will know as I do that is not fast and it is expensive. You would get possession in the end by one means or another but whether or not the delay is an option for you is another matter.
Can I clarify anything for you?
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

Can't I just give the statutory notice, he is paying his rent.

It depends how far into the AST he is.
You can try to evict him using S8.
Or you can use S21 but obviously only if the AST is going to end anyway.
Remus2004 and other Property Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 2 years ago.

The tenant is currently holding over.