Ask an Property Solicitor. Get an Answer ASAP.
Hello and thank you for your question. My name is ***** ***** I will be very pleased to assist you. I'm a practising lawyer in England with over 15 years’ experience. Please be aware that although I will endeavour to reply to you promptly, I am also in full time private practice and so I may not be available to respond immediately and it may also take me a few minutes to prepare a reply. The site will notify you as soon as I respond. I look forward to working with you to answer your question fully.
May I confirm, with the extension be built on land which is demised to them under the lease exclusively or would it be being built on land which is either communal land for all of the leaseholders too use or alternatively, land which remains part of the freehold is not granted to any specific leaseholder?
thank you. There will be a provision in the lease almost without question that will say no alterations without the landlord's consent and the provision may go on to say such consent is not to be unreasonably withheld. However, this clause applies in so far as the client to make alterations internally within their flat. Building an extension goes much further than this will involve cutting into and probably cutting away from the main structure of the building which belongs to the freeholder and not the leaseholder. As such, this is not covered by any such clause along the lines of the above and where a leaseholder seeks to cut into or cut away the structure of the building which belongs to the freeholder, there is no obligation on the landlord to consent.
Ass such, the landlord can either simply refuse permission unreasonably or not or more commonly, can consent to permission but demand a premium for doing so. There is no specific amounts that can or cannot be charged in relation to a premium remembering that of course the landlord is under no obligation in respect of granting consent for works that involve cutting away the structure of the building which they own but it is common for negotiations to begin on the basis of 50% of the increase in value to the leaseholder's property that is not to suggest that that is where negotiations end up necessarily. Typically, a landlord in such circumstances would appoint a surveyor at the leaseholder's cost to negotiate on the point for them.
it is hard to see from my perspective how an extension can be built without cutting into or cutting away part of the structure of the building. An extension would generally require either removing part of the existing walls or at the very least integrating the new brickwork into the existing structure of the building - one cannot build an extension just by building it next to an existing building without intergrating it to the existing building. you can cause look at the proposed plans and ask questions in this respect and the lease will likely provide that you can appoint a surveyor at the leaseholder's costs in relation to any permission the leaseholder seeks and the surveyor will be able to advise you in more detail in this respect. As above, to the extent thhe leaseholder requires to cut into or cutaway any of the structure of the property, a premium can be demanded on the above basis.
on the basis that the extensioon would involve cutting in two or cutting away from the structure of the building, as above, the freeholders have a right to refuse consent. Joint freeholders must act together and therefore if one of you refuses consent, the others can proceed to grant consent without a unanimous decision. There is no majority vote in the case of joint ownership. It is all or nothing
plans should be prepared by a surveyor more commonly an architect. In respect of what you can charge to the leaseholder, remembering that in the assumption I am correct in my belief that they would not be able to carry out the work without carrying out work to the structure of the property, you do not have to grant consent, it follows that you can demand any conditions you want as a condition for granting consent. this could include any requirements you have in relation to a surveyor
in respect of the lease, If an extension is built, the lease would ideally require a variation both to redraw the plan and also potentially to consider reworking the allocation of service charge proportion between the respective flats as if one flat is subsequently larger than other flats or at least larger than it was before, it follows that it potentially should pay more service charge to reflect the amount of future maintenance that may be required - though this point is entirely up to you all to decide
thank you. Unless there are two separate freehold titles (which from what you describe not think is the case) I do not think the above substantively changes what we have discussed above. However as you say, you are correct that this is not a particularly good way to deal with maintenance of the building and may potentially raise questions upon any sale of a flat from an interested buyer